Category Archives: Politics

So, a new law will be passed.

excerpt:

PUTRAJAYA: The Government will soon introduce a regulation requiring non-Muslims wishing to convert to Islam to inform their family before doing so.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said this would prevent problems of families disputing the conversion of their loved ones when they die. He suggested that non-Muslims who intend to convert have a form or letter declaring that their families had been told and had understood his or her decision.

Noting that there was no such regulation at present, Abdullah advised them to inform their families to “make things easier for everyone.”  - Read full article

I wonder if this law was made in the interest of the convert, or for the convenience of the authorities? Does it really solve the problem? How does the law help the convert?

Has anyone asked the question as to WHY a non-muslim convert does it in secret? I’ll suggest a reason: the family won’t agree and won’t accept the person any more. So now they HAVE to tell them that they’ve converted. SO? What makes the government think that by telling of their conversion, the convert can obtain the signatures to acknowlege it?

I tell you, when your family disowns you, and looks at you in disdain, and make your life a terrible one, the last thing on your list of worries is who gets your body after you die.

So a person wants to become a muslim. His family disagrees. They don’t sign the declaration. What happens then? Is he recognised as a muslim by the authorities? when he dies, will the Islamic authorities accept that they have no claim over the deceased body, or will they bring the kadi from the mosque the deceased frequents for his prayers and proclaim that the deceased is indeed a muslim, and take away the body anyway. It’ll be quite interesting how this law will be enforced, especially on the part of the religious authorities.

Cant we see that there exists a system here in our country, where ‘religious correctness’ takes precedence over the person’s welfare. What makes it worse is that this ‘religious correctness’ is very nicely embedded into the laws of the land.

Ex: A woman has the word ‘Muslim’ on her IC. But she doesnt pray to Allah, she doesn’t know Him, nor does she practice Islam in anyway. She lives and breathes Christianity. When she desires to have the word ‘Muslim’ removed, the National Registration Department says they have no jurisdiction over this. Since you are ‘technically’ a Muslim, the case is transferred to the Syariah courts, who, of course, will legally label this apostasy, and will have none of it. Application rejected. Muktamad. When the (christian in ’spirit and truth’) lady dies, and her Christian family wants to bury her body, the religious authorities come knocking down the door saying she’s a Muslim and so they have to have the body.

the scenario above is an amalgamation of recent, real incidents. What you make of it, I leave up to your judgement, but it ‘kinda’ accurately illustrates my point about the religious rigidity the government enforces.

It seems to me that this law was only made for the ‘convenience’ of keeping everything ‘by the book’. It doesn’t really ‘make things easier for everyone’ as Pak Lah says. Especially for the central person in the quagmire - the convert.

Btw, can I suggest another law be made that if a Muslim WANTS to leave Islam, and the family consents, and signs a form, that the authorities won’t hound give them a difficult time?

P/S: Forgive the rather cluttered post. I was thinking as I was typing, so the thoughts may seem a little strewn.

I’ve taken this portion off a series of comments that was made on this post . would like to know what others think.

An accurate interpretation of this verse plays an important role in helping me decide how I live in this country (on in countries with a similar situation as Malaysia), where the government clearly seems to be partial, and unfair in some of its administration, and how I respond to it.

I’d be interested to hear how this verse has influenced christians from other countries too…

  1. Guna said,

    December 19, 2007 @ 2:12 pm

    How do you understand Rom 13 in light of all you have said?


  2. John Ling said,

    December 19, 2007 @ 2:54 pm

    I understand that many Christians use this as an excuse not to oppose tyranny, corruption, and racism. But some common sense is in order.

    Verse 1: “Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established.”

    There is indeed NO authority EXCEPT that which God has established. Just because BN is physically in power does not mean it has the God-given authority. And any authority not established by God should not be blindly followed. Otherwise, why would you want the Malaysian opposition to topple BN and win the next general elections?

    In verse 3: “For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong.”

    When rulers hold terror against those who do right, then they are not of God.

    In verse 6: “This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God’s servants, who give their full time to governing.”

    Many BN politicians don’t give their full time to governing. They are misappropriating public funds for their own personal business ventures. Servants of God do not do this.

BERSIH is Malay for clean.

On Saturday, a number of rakyat (citizens) made their voice heard. The King has seen their heartcry, and the government has been given a solemn warning that the present generation are not to be taken lightly.

BERSIH thoughts:
1. I had read the memorandum some months ago, and very impressed by suggestions and I think they are very valid and, more importantly, doable steps that can be taken to restore the credibility of the Election Committee and the electoral system.

2. Despite the fact that my mother nearly missed her bus back to Penang on Saturday due to the traffic jams (I getting ready to ask who should I refer to to get a bus ticket refund if we missed it), I’m happy for the outcome of BERSIH’s rally. That the King was willing to receive the memorandum from His people, is a glimmer of hope that there could be reforms, initiated not by the Prime Minister, but by the Sovereign of the country Himself.

3. I’m impressed by the planning done for the rally, right down to the 500cc superbike pillioned by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to break through the traffic jam to reach the palace gates on time.

4. Its funny to read of the government now fully utilising the mainstream media to condemn the rally and label 40,000 people braving heavy rain and police action, chemical sprays and tear gasses to pursue something they believe in, a political gimmick (The Star, 12Nov2007, page 2).

Dear government, if it is a political gimmick, wouldn’t you agree, they are surely outdoing your gimmicks (like sending an astronaut to space! Haha!)? There is no smoke without fire. The opposition parties are one thing, but to get over 70 non-governmental bodies to cooperate with them, is not an easy thing to do. Obviously they have good reason to support the rally.
The government has just proven its iron claw on mainstream media (read free speech) in its response through and the content in it (mainstream media).

5. It’s a fantastic feeling to see many Malaysians saying Daulat Tuanku!, showing that people have not given up hope on their King, or given in to the idea of a puppet King.

6. Its wonderful to see a good number of non-governmental bodies, including the opposition, identifying issues of common benefit to the people, like the importance of clean elections, and setting aside differences to pursue it wholeheartedly. If only this could be trend in many issues, where constitutional adherence, as well as common and civil good takes first (and only?) place, then the opposition would be able to form a credible alternative to the ruling coalition, and give the people real sense of security when voting against the ruling coalition.

7. Watching some of the videos, I found the crowd to be quite rowdy indeed. Angry, incensed, verbal abuse of the police and government. It could quite easily have been a very violent encounter. Don’t blame all the violence on the police.
The civil disobedience displayed was not quite the stuff we would have seen Ghandi practice.

8. With the ‘success’ of BERSIH’s rally, we must ask ourselves how far are we willing to make civil disobedience a Malaysian way?
Does this rally become the precedence for all future unhappiness?
Fuel prices are going to be raised soon. What colour should we wear this time?

9. It’ll be interesting to know how many of the numbers that appeared, actually know what the memorandum contained? More interestingly, how many were really interested in governmental reform and understood the implications of the reforms on themselves? Eg, if the new government is sworn in and bumiputera priviledges are reduced (in accordance to constitution), how many of the 40,000 would say “Long live the government”?

10. The rally eventually adopted a very Muslim flavour to it, with the shouts of Allahu Akbar quite pronounced. Its no surprise however, as many of the protesters were Malays, but I wonder if Lim Kit Siang also echoed their hails? I’ve nothing against the Muslims in this regard, after all we have all learnt to tolerate the five-times-daily prayers at mosques, but seeing this is supposed to be a rakyats’ rally, I’m not very comfortable with the resulting Muslim taste to the BERSIH rally.

11. Today we hear the cries of Daulat Tuanku! because we still have hope. Would we be saying the same thing if His Royal Highness, after reading the petition, does not do anything? We need to decide on our response. We have now put ourselves in the hands of the Malaysia’s Sovreign. Do we accept the Sovreign decree, or turn against Him as well and continue protesting?

12. The winds of change have come, be prepared for a new government, here are just two possibilities we must be prepared for:
a. Foreign investment may slow down, as investors may withold funds as the wait and see the stability and outcome of the first government change in the history of independent Malaysia
b. If the new government inherits huge debts, further fuel subsidies may be cut, resulting in higher fuel prices
c. The opposition parties have NEVER been able to totally agree on a political manifesto because of their extremely diverse objectives. There is no indication of change in this area in the recent months nor years, and there is no guarantee that things will be better, let alone the same, if the opposition gets into power.
d. If the King decrees the implementation of the points outlined in the memorandum, and the ruling coalition still wins, are we ready to accept the fact, or shall we go on another rally?

13. The country is far from being BERSIH, and Saturday was a start, but I wouldn’t want Saturday to be a trend.

Christians, be reminded. Whatever reforms we succeed in making, will never usher in the Millenial Kingdom. As long as the government is being run by men and women with a sinful nature, there will be results of that same nature, corruption, injustice, selfishness, etc…

True national peace and properity on earth will only be realized when the Lord Jesus comes to reign on the earth for a thousand years, and the false ‘holy grail’ called democracy is done away with and replaced by the monarchy of the King of kings, and Lord of lords, the Lord Jesus Christ.

Come Lord Jesus!

Now this is worth watching. The truth cannot be hidden.

I wish we could have the same national spirit as we had then.